The Business of COVID-19

This global plandemic that has seen the demise of our freedoms via good planning, a gradually dumbed down population, control of all sources of info and a psychopathic private corporation acting as ‘government’ complete with its own police service to carry out its orders has our ancestors rolling in their graves

The Enslavement of Humanity with the Private Vaccine Agenda

Take a look at the total re-branding of the flu, the business structure, the marketing strategy of how to make $160 Billion from an injection. Leith takes you through the actual business document of the (International Money Fund) in 1 hour and 17 minutes.

Can we just have the flu back?

 

Questions to ask?

There are a couple of ways of approaching this whole craziness, DECLINE, ask for better and more particulars so you can give INFORMED CONSENT or ‘CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE’, or asking to see your private medical records is in breach of our Privacy Act 1988 (Cth).

“I write with regard to the matter of potential covid vaccine and my desire to be fully informed and appraised of ALL facts before going ahead. I’d be most grateful if you could please provide the following information, in accordance with statutory legal requirements.”

  1. Can you please advise the approved legal status of any vaccine and if it is experimental?
  2. Can you please provide details and assurances that the vaccine has been fully, independently and rigorously tested against control groups and the subsequent outcomes of those test?
  3. Can you please advise the entire list of contents of the vaccine I am to receive and if any are toxic to the body?
  4. Can you please fully advise of all the adverse reactions associated with this vaccine since its introduction?
  5. Can you please confirm that the vaccine you are advocating is NOT experimental mRNA gene altering therapy?
  6. Can you please confirm that i will not be under any duress from yourselves as my employers, in compliance with the Nuremberg Code?
  7. Can you please advise me of the likely risk of fatality, should I be unfortunate to contract Covid 19 and the likelihood of recovery?
  8. Can you please advise me if i were to experience any adverse reactions is the manufacturer of the vaccine liable? If the manufacturer isn’t liable will the company Im currently employed with will be responsible and liable as it is their request that I have the vaccine in order to carry on my employment

 

“Once I have received the above information in full and i am satisfied that there is NO threat to my health, I will be happy to accept your offer to receive the treatment, but with certain conditions – namely that:

  1. You confirm in writing that I will suffer no harm.
  2. following acceptance of this, the offer must be signed by a fully qualified doctor who will take full legal and financial responsibility for any injuries occurring to myself, and/or from any interactions by authorised personnel regarding these procedures.
  3. In the event that  i should have to decline the offer of vaccination, please confirm that it will not compromise my position and that I will not suffer prejudice and discrimination as a result?

 

I would also advise that my inalienable rights are reserved”.

More Research Articles on Jab Page.

Laws to quote when dealing with employers or schools in regards to the jab

In your letter, you have stated that if our client chooses not to be vaccinated, this will be considered “refusal to comply with a reasonable and lawful direction” and a “breach of the law” and that her employment may be terminated on these grounds. 

 

The PHO does not require you to terminate your employees and in our view, you do not have the grounds to do so.  In addition, the PHO is in conflict with laws that protect the rights of our client and the PHO may not in fact be determined in a Court as a reasonable and lawful direction. For example, numerous laws, regulations and policies protect the right of informed consent in receiving a vaccine or any medical procedure, including:

  • The Commonwealth Constitution which prohibits civil conscription in medical and dental services (s.51(23A)).
  • The Biosecurity Act 2015 (Cth) which prohibits vaccination or treatment without meeting the stringent requirements of an individual Human Biosecurity Control Order (s.92), and prohibits the use of force for vaccination (s.95).
  • The UNESCO Statement on Bioethics and Human Rights, which states “Any preventative diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason, without disadvantage and without prejudice” (Art.6).
  • The Criminal Code Act 1995(Cth), which relates to interfering with political liberty states “Any person who, by violence or by threats or intimidation of any kind, hinders or interferes with the free exercise or performance, by any other person of any political right or duty shall be guilty of an offence” (s.83.4).
  • The official Australian Immunisation Handbook, which states that for consent to be legally valid, “It must be given voluntarily in the absence of undue pressure, coercion or manipulation.” (s.2.1.3).
  • The Nuremberg Code, which states “The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential” (Art.1).

 

We ask that you consider your duty of care to your employees, the risk of liability to your business and your personal liability if you choose to require our client to be vaccinated as a condition of her employment.  It may not be a defence for you to rely on a PHO which is found to be unlawful, particularly where there is a risk of harm, injury or death involved.

 

We would like to provide you with some direct evidence, which you may or may not be aware of, so you can carefully consider your response.  The COVID vaccines have “provisional” approval for emergency use as new medicines. There has been no independent efficacy, safety and quality testing.  Both Pfizer and AstraZenca have not made claims that their products prevent transmission or COVID disease/infection, but only that they may lessen symptoms. 

 

Page 34 of TGA’s Public Assessment Report sets out the limitations of the data that was relied upon for TGA to make its “provisional” approval and it says: 

⁃      It is not yet known whether the vaccine prevents viral transmission.  The TGA has confirmed this in Parliament hearings and question time.

⁃      It is not yet known whether the vaccine is safe when combined with other vaccines in the body. This is also confirmed in the Pfizer Product information sheet “Interaction with other vaccines and other medications has not been studied.”

⁃      It is not yet known whether the vaccine provides protection from infection (Where it says a “correlate of protection has yet to be established” and immunogenicity cannot be considered protective at this stage – this means that yes the vaccine triggers an immune response, but it is not yet confirmed that the immune response triggered by the vaccine actually protects from infection).