This global plandemic that has seen the demise of our freedoms via good planning, a gradually dumbed down population, control of all sources of info and a psychopathic private corporation acting as ‘government’ complete with its own police service to carry out its orders has our ancestors rolling in their graves
Take a look at the total re-branding of the flu, the business structure, the marketing strategy of how to make $160 Billion from an injection. Leith takes you through the actual business document of the (International Money Fund) in 1 hour and 17 minutes.
Can we just have the flu back?
There are a couple of ways of approaching this whole craziness, DECLINE, ask for better and more particulars so you can give INFORMED CONSENT or ‘CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE’, or asking to see your private medical records is in breach of our Privacy Act 1988 (Cth).
“I write with regard to the matter of potential covid vaccine and my desire to be fully informed and appraised of ALL facts before going ahead. I’d be most grateful if you could please provide the following information, in accordance with statutory legal requirements.”
“Once I have received the above information in full and i am satisfied that there is NO threat to my health, I will be happy to accept your offer to receive the treatment, but with certain conditions – namely that:
I would also advise that my inalienable rights are reserved”.
More Research Articles on Jab Page.
In your letter, you have stated that if our client chooses not to be vaccinated, this will be considered “refusal to comply with a reasonable and lawful direction” and a “breach of the law” and that her employment may be terminated on these grounds.
The PHO does not require you to terminate your employees and in our view, you do not have the grounds to do so. In addition, the PHO is in conflict with laws that protect the rights of our client and the PHO may not in fact be determined in a Court as a reasonable and lawful direction. For example, numerous laws, regulations and policies protect the right of informed consent in receiving a vaccine or any medical procedure, including:
We ask that you consider your duty of care to your employees, the risk of liability to your business and your personal liability if you choose to require our client to be vaccinated as a condition of her employment. It may not be a defence for you to rely on a PHO which is found to be unlawful, particularly where there is a risk of harm, injury or death involved.
We would like to provide you with some direct evidence, which you may or may not be aware of, so you can carefully consider your response. The COVID vaccines have “provisional” approval for emergency use as new medicines. There has been no independent efficacy, safety and quality testing. Both Pfizer and AstraZenca have not made claims that their products prevent transmission or COVID disease/infection, but only that they may lessen symptoms.
Page 34 of TGA’s Public Assessment Report sets out the limitations of the data that was relied upon for TGA to make its “provisional” approval and it says:
⁃ It is not yet known whether the vaccine prevents viral transmission. The TGA has confirmed this in Parliament hearings and question time.
⁃ It is not yet known whether the vaccine is safe when combined with other vaccines in the body. This is also confirmed in the Pfizer Product information sheet “Interaction with other vaccines and other medications has not been studied.”
⁃ It is not yet known whether the vaccine provides protection from infection (Where it says a “correlate of protection has yet to be established” and immunogenicity cannot be considered protective at this stage – this means that yes the vaccine triggers an immune response, but it is not yet confirmed that the immune response triggered by the vaccine actually protects from infection).